
In books read on October 10, 2002
Hmmm, I see I wrote in my writeup of A Fall in Denver, the second book in this series that the book took a while to get going. This is the third in the series and the same is true. If I was subjecting books to a 50 page test, or even a 100 page test, then I don't think I would have finished this.
I enjoy the decently plotted scientifically bent plots and Em Hansen solves mysteries using skills she's learnt as a geologist. I enjoy her mixed-upped-ness and her family failings and her not quite with it attitude to life. There's lots here that I love but I just don't like the beginnings.
One of the problems with amateur sleuths is that they have trouble falling over dead bodies all the time in books, something a professional detective can get away with. I do think the author has done an admirable job of making Em's detective work realistic by tieing the necessary shennaigans into a plot thicker than crude oil but I think something is definitely missing from the beginning of these books. I'd either like a ten page summary of the first hundred pages to get me into the heart of the mystery faster or I'd like a mini-mystery, related to the main one or not, to get tied up earlier in the book.
At the moment I don't feel much like trying book four but I might give Andrews another chance to write a beginning before I write her off because I really do enjoy her middles and endings.
Purchased on 28th February 2000.

In Uncategorized on October 10, 2002
m c escher in lego is wonderful. it’s a a lego reconstruction
of the famous picture in which monks appear to be constantly ascending or
descending a square of staircase. don’t scroll down the page until
you’ve had a good look at the photo of the model as they explain how they
built it further down the page.
they’ve also recreated escher’s balcony and belvedere
drawings. i think the belvedere one isn’t quite as seamless as the others
because the bumps on the lego bricks give the perspective tricks away a bit
too much. i think they must’ve had cracking fun creating these.
[found via milk and cookies via wander lust]

In Uncategorized on October 10, 2002
this little touch typing game word shark
is amusing me no end as i’m not a very good touch typist. i’m too used to
looking at the keyboard though when i don’t think about it i find i hardly
need to. i’m fine at typing real words with regular letter patterns, my
fingers seem to know what they are doing. as soon as this game wants me
to type odd letters or strange sets of initials i’m totally at sea. i came
out with 46 words per minutes at 97% accuracy which i don’t think is too
shabby. it certainly merits a “could do better” though.
i nearly managed to type the whole of that last paragraph looking at the screen too.
[found via #!/usr/bin/girl]

In Uncategorized on October 9, 2002
this cross browser dynamic html library
has been my favourite toy since 4am this morning though this may change at
whim if it scuppers my plans. i’ve found a situation where client side scripting
will be an advantage rather than an inconvinience. the problem with working
for myself is that i still do too much of it.

In Uncategorized on October 8, 2002
from the history of the yorkshire building society:
- 1866
- West Yorkshire Building Society is established at the Royal Hotel in Dewsbury with only two staff.
- 1871
- The luxury of an umbrella and a rug were purchased for the Society’s offices.
were they necessary to help people buy houses? building society employees were obviously fiddling the expenses even then.

In Uncategorized on October 7, 2002
The issue of which web browser is the “best” has caused some
quite heated arguments in the last few years. This page attempts to settle
this once and for all, in the time-honoured tradition of holding a Connect-Four
tournament.
mozilla is beating ie6 by 2622 games to 2022 with opera coming in third.
[found via as above]

In books read on October 6, 2002
Partway through this I thought it might turn out to be one of the most stunning mysteries I'd ever read but I felt it trailed off a bit towards the end and perhaps went on a little too long to acheive its full potential
The gimmick here is that the narrator Kay Farrow suffers from an achromatic eye condition which means that she can only perceive shades of grey and no colour at all. She makes her living as a black and white photographer and is following a group of street children and sex workers in San Francisco as material for her next book. One teenage boy she gets very close to turns up dismembered and Kay feels that no one will investigate his death properly if she doesn't.
This is a cracking story on many levels, great descriptions of San Francisco, some very interesting characters, a fascinating premise for the story and a central character with a disability that becomes part of the tale and isn't just a hook to hang a moral on. I'm glad to learn that Hunt has written a followup book Trick Shot that also features Kay as I'd like to see her again but this did feel very much like a standalone.
Purchased on 24th February 2002.

In books read on October 5, 2002
This is probably the least mysterious and least psychological story I've read from Vine/Rendell. The action takes place in a small Norfolk village where Jenny Warner is caring for Stella Newlands who is dying of lung cancer in a residential home. It's the kind of gradually unfolding story that Vine is good at where you aren't quite sure what the real mystery is going to turn out to be. Only in this case I didn't think that there was really anything discovered that was worth the build up.
I enjoyed the book but I wouldn't recommend it to anyone looking for mystery, thrills or suspense. What we have here is a really interesting story that might have worked well in a general fiction book but didn't really fit into the genre it was billed as.
The only thing that was really wrong with this book for me was that I read an edition that had been butchered from its original British English into American English for what seemed to be no particularly good reason. I can't believe that any vaguely literate American would have trouble figuring out that "ladybirds" were "ladybugs" or that a "plough" is a "plow" seeing as these words are all used in context. These changes dragged me out of the setting. I suppose I deserve that for reading an edition that wasn't aimed at me but it has left me wondering what else gets changed between the author and the reader and what on earth publishers must think of their reader's intelligence.
Purchased on 17th January 2001.

In Uncategorized on October 2, 2002
what could be bought for an old penny in 1264, can be bought for £3.07 today. a 1900 penny would buy as much as 26p today and a 1950 penny would buy 8p worth of goods. so their penny chews must’ve been overpriced in times gone by. from: how much is that worth today?